11/09/2006

When Dr Asri become Shahibus Samahah...

I don't know is it the true or not that Dr Asri get the invitation to become mufti for state of Perlis. Still, don't know whether Dr asri receive or not that position. Such in this way, if he receives that position maybe he will appointed exactly on 1 October. All already known keilmuan Dr asri but I'm quite sad when geng2 salafiyun(salafiyun is a euphemism for wahabi) said "alhamdullialah doa kita termakmul utk melihat salafi memimpin umah di Malaysia ni."

Perlis well-known as one of state that hold Sunnah in Malaysia. They are practice all Mazhab without obtain to one Mazhab. When Dr asri maybe will invited that position is like org mengantuk disorongkan bantal la. Some people said (khalaf, they will preoccupy about this appointment) it truly "good" coz there will burst out a big argument and battle between mufti perils and mufti n9. Mufti n9 is more like to accept the tarekat way, meanwhile salafi known as one group that seem totally pull out the tarekat way. Honestly, there have certain thing that I am not agreeing about Dr Asri especially in the way of khilafiyah subject and how he give opinion on some issues (such as seban's issue and etc). Dr Harunsani before this variably touches about khilafiyah, Pluralisme and Liberal problem but Salafiin Malaysia just refer and excerpt about Pluralisme and Liberal and erase about khilafiyah. Yup, what I can see salafi in Malaysia are stronger supporter for Dr asri. Dr asri I truly admits is good in Hadis but when he goes into fiqh principle for certain people he does it in not pretty well. In certain ways, Ahlul Hadis do not absolutely well in come out with opinion of fekah principle. For example the story between imam hanafi and one ahli hadis. The ahli hadis question why he can't solve the fiqh problem in same time he remember hundred of thousand hadis.

Seriously I myself have take a lot of knowledge from fiqh salafi. They, what I can see practice ibadah with fully of knowledge how the one ibadah had been done by Rasul (saw) without increasing any method. They also have strong knowledge about dalil from al-quran and sunnah about one amal.

Besides that, I am not really happy about the way his (Dr Asri) prejudice about Syiah. It obviously could saw when he defends the fatwa Syeikh Jibrin about Syiah. Yes, that fatwa are come out 4 years ago and it against rafidi not syiah the whole, but the way he defends like another salafiyun defends. They claim another group too obsesses, taksub or ghuluw with their tok guru but they also do the same thing. Salafi will defend of ulama salafi. Khalaf will defends of ulama khalaf. Nothing was more. Ok back to the topic,Dr Asri at another side I am really respect on his acknowledge about hadis. As conclusion I am not concern if Dr Asri take that place or not but I am worry if he terlalu lantang membidaahkan org who got different opinion and perception with him. What the biggest worry is if his supporter and his dead hardcore student (Qayyim) lebih sudu dari kuah. For certain people,this appointment is looming.


p/s: di atas just of my luahan persaaan, sape la aku insan yg kerdil ini utk mengkritik ulama.